This review is for: So-M1-1B Erla VANDR Civilian-type
The submitted article is/has…
[+] A general topic sentence under the title header
[+] Artwork (illustrations are strongly encouraged for all spacecraft and handheld items)
[+] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[+] In the proper format/template
[+] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[+] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[+] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[+] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[+] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[+] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[+] Obtusely redundant
[+] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[+] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[+] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[+] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[+] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[+] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[+] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[+]Lacking Detail
The article has…
[+] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[+] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[+] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[+] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Summary
As stated this is a stripped down version of the original, no tech issues.
Status: Approved.
