What's new
  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 April 2024 is YE 46.3 in the RP.

Approved Submission [SMX/NMX] Mishhuvurthyar Tentacles

CadetNewb

CadetNewb

Well-Known Member
Submission Type: Biology
Template Used:N/A
Submission WIP URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:mishhuvurthyar:tentacles
Submission Destination URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=species:mishhuvurthyar:tentacles

Faction:
FM Approved Yet: No, @Wes
Faction requires art: No

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles: Yes
Contains New art: Yes
Previously Submitted: Yes, previous article was unfinished

Notes:

This article is meant to more clearly define the Mishhuvurthyar's biology. It also has a sub-article in the NSFW section which will also need approval along with the main article.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
Articles like these scare me as a GM that heavily uses Mishhuvurthyar.

It seems like the result is usually making things clear-cut in the setting. When things are made clear-cut, if I want tpo go creative with the Mishhu, it might invite feedback like "You're not doing it right, the wiki says how the Mishhu are".

It's happened to me before, and it's never fun.

This is not an objection so much as a reservation. Usually, knowing Cadet, this invites feedback like "well, Fred, I'd be happy to accommodate you if you told me how it's actually done in my plot"... but that's not the issue. It's about being able to take some liberties later without being too limited by someone having narrowed things down earlier. >_>;
 
Though I can understand the fear of losing potential GM tools and the freedom that ambiguity grants, we do need something to give people a better guideline than what's currently available. Which is, humorously enough, an unfinished version of this very same article that Wes still preferred over the original he made. Sharing the same concerns you have, it's also why I wrote the article the way I did; I've gone ahead and edited the article to make it more clear that the limbs listed are in no way, shape, or form the only ones available to the Mishhuvurthyar @Fred .
 
Thanks Cadet. I know I'm a it of a party pooper when it comes to topics like this.

I appreciate you taking steps to reassure me. :)
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top