Ethereal
Banned Member
Hi all,
I have a feeling this might be the wrong place to post, so feel free to move the thread wherever's best.
There was some chatting regarding awards in the Discord yesterday and I was messaging a couple of people in DMs about the Command Award in particular.
I feel like the award's text may benefit from some clarification, as to the spirit of the award itself and the intention behind it.
I imagine it was so that the commander of a small ship would get a citation for every mission they are present on the Bridge for, to be rewarded for taking on responsibility. However, there's scope beyond this that may need clarification, or perhaps a reward of its own.
Firstly, is there any distinction between crew sizes, such as a Ketsueki-Class ship versus a Chiharu-Class ship? I'm sure there are department heads that have to command a staff on larger ships that are greater than the total crew manpower of smaller ships. There's also the question of whether individual fighter pilots or squadron leaders of 10/20/30/50 fighters would be eligible or not. Is the spirit of the award more to do with displaying leadership qualities, or is it tied to the prestige of being the de-jure Captain alone?
Secondly, what is considered "equivalent" to a starship, as per the wording of the award? Is a Century the equivalent, which would have the manpower of two Fuji-Class gunships at recommended capacity? This would discount the commanders of isolated Rikugun platoons, SAINT/SOFT teams and Ranger commanders from receiving the reward.
Finally, what about in the case where the de-jure Captain isn't present during the mission, incapacitated, or is otherwise occupied with business that means they aren't in command? What if they've explicitly delegated command to someone else, who is then commanding 10/20/30/50 people in their place? Or delegated 4/5ths of their responsibility to their XO, senior NCO or someone else?
If the spirit of the award is to commend people who have adequately held command to complete a mission, some lexical update to the requirements would go a long way. It'd also make the award less restrictive than being explicitly tied and hard-locked to rank, as there's no award currently for commending lower officers and NCOs that have to fill in for a Captain by necessity, or whom a Captain has voluntarily delegated the success of a mission to.
Failing that, perhaps a more generic leadership award might be a future addition, to reward those who take the initiative to shoulder the responsibility of a mission. It would even help COs and XOs have a better idea of who to delegate to, as citations for command or leadership would make those with aptitude stand out from the award. Obviously, the same benefits would be reaped by clarifying the Command Award as detailed above, without the necessity of a new award for near similar circumstances.
Unlike most awards that are given at Captain's discretion, someone mentioned to me that Star Army Command is the only entity that can award Captains, so in this case the clarification would go a long way.
Thanks for reading, let me know your thoughts.
I have a feeling this might be the wrong place to post, so feel free to move the thread wherever's best.
There was some chatting regarding awards in the Discord yesterday and I was messaging a couple of people in DMs about the Command Award in particular.
I feel like the award's text may benefit from some clarification, as to the spirit of the award itself and the intention behind it.
I imagine it was so that the commander of a small ship would get a citation for every mission they are present on the Bridge for, to be rewarded for taking on responsibility. However, there's scope beyond this that may need clarification, or perhaps a reward of its own.
Firstly, is there any distinction between crew sizes, such as a Ketsueki-Class ship versus a Chiharu-Class ship? I'm sure there are department heads that have to command a staff on larger ships that are greater than the total crew manpower of smaller ships. There's also the question of whether individual fighter pilots or squadron leaders of 10/20/30/50 fighters would be eligible or not. Is the spirit of the award more to do with displaying leadership qualities, or is it tied to the prestige of being the de-jure Captain alone?
Secondly, what is considered "equivalent" to a starship, as per the wording of the award? Is a Century the equivalent, which would have the manpower of two Fuji-Class gunships at recommended capacity? This would discount the commanders of isolated Rikugun platoons, SAINT/SOFT teams and Ranger commanders from receiving the reward.
Finally, what about in the case where the de-jure Captain isn't present during the mission, incapacitated, or is otherwise occupied with business that means they aren't in command? What if they've explicitly delegated command to someone else, who is then commanding 10/20/30/50 people in their place? Or delegated 4/5ths of their responsibility to their XO, senior NCO or someone else?
If the spirit of the award is to commend people who have adequately held command to complete a mission, some lexical update to the requirements would go a long way. It'd also make the award less restrictive than being explicitly tied and hard-locked to rank, as there's no award currently for commending lower officers and NCOs that have to fill in for a Captain by necessity, or whom a Captain has voluntarily delegated the success of a mission to.
Failing that, perhaps a more generic leadership award might be a future addition, to reward those who take the initiative to shoulder the responsibility of a mission. It would even help COs and XOs have a better idea of who to delegate to, as citations for command or leadership would make those with aptitude stand out from the award. Obviously, the same benefits would be reaped by clarifying the Command Award as detailed above, without the necessity of a new award for near similar circumstances.
Unlike most awards that are given at Captain's discretion, someone mentioned to me that Star Army Command is the only entity that can award Captains, so in this case the clarification would go a long way.
Thanks for reading, let me know your thoughts.
Last edited: