This review is for: Desert Rider with URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:skyguard:dr1
The submitted article is/has…
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] A very high level of overall quality
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] In the proper format/template
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] No red and/or broken links
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Obtusely redundant
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Lacking Detail
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[٩(◕‿◕)۶ ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
To the submitter: Is this a refit or overhaul of a previous article? If yes, provide a link and a list of changes.
Approved