I open the page and I'm immediately reminded of Reassembly ships. We're starting off ok.
[ ✔️ ] 1. The destination URL should be a page in the appropriate namespace and titled lower_case_with_underscores
[ ✔️ ] 2. The article is in the appropriate format and article template
[ ❌ ] 3. The article follows our wiki style guidelines, including: No forced line breaks, text after each section header, etc.
Holy heck please separate the Bridge section into individual paragraphs.
[ ✔️ ] 4. The article is easily read and free of errors in spelling and grammar
[ ✔️ ] 5. Links to other wiki articles are present as appropriate
[ ✔️ ] 6. The article fits into the Star Army universe's space opera theme and technology levels
[ ✔️ ] 7. Images in the article are hosted on Star Army's wiki and sourced responsibly (contact Wes privately if there's a concern)
[ ✔️ ] 8. The article is original and doesn't contain copy-pasted content from other articles.
[ ❌ ] 9. The article complies with Star Army's rules in terms of damage ratings, speed limits, etc.
The REE Warhead (and the RUDaaS) are still unapproved, due to the fact that Zack still has not replied to concerns brought up in the threads.
Additionally, since S6 is its own faction now, you can't use it in the first place. Sad.
I'm completely fine with you making your own if you want though.
Also how many are there in the first place?
What are Plasma Rotor Main Engines and Graviton Induction Drives?
TEWs are acceptable...until the Multimissile Warhead is factored in, then it's a bit over.
If you want only drop pods I'd suggest making your own.
Life Support Containers are USO tech, not S6 tech.
I agree to the tech sharing, though I would like to be asked permission first if articles are being made off of articles I've made. Also new tech will have to be given through RP, given we aren't actually there to instantly share anything new. All current designs are useable by the USO, and can be manufactured, but can not be modified.
Additionally, I will remove weapons linked that are not approved, but I am not sure how many to add of the others to compensate.
The engines are the same as was used on the original SS1, this ship's predecessor. Which it was approved with (also don't have another part for that). I don't know what TEW stands for. And finally I will make sure to break up the bridge description.
I think that covers all the issues unless I missed something.....
I think it’s best we detail how the engines function rather than just giving it a name and nothing else. It’s just a good practice to keep. Those thrusters are nothing new to SARP, so they don’t have to be too heavy on words. Just a model and some simple details on how they function.
Now it's a little under-gunned but you can throw on 15 more T8 weapons or double the number of little Starship lasers if you want.
[ ✔️ ] 1. State clearly that the article is approved in the submission thread
[ ✔️ ] 2. Move the wiki article to its permanent (destination) location on the wiki
[ ✔️ ] 3. Move the submission thread to the Approved Submissions subforum or get a moderator to
[ ✔️ ] 4. Edit the article to add a link to the approval thread in the OOC Notes section
[ ✔️ ] 5. Link other articles to the approved article as appropriate (equipment lists, etc.)