Implemented Wiki: Let starships be locations

[hyralt]

At a glance, it looks like the starship: namespace is not included in the namespaces that are locations, since I don't see the location struct fields on the Bastion of Winter. But stararmy:starships: does have the location struct fields, since I can see them on the Resurgence of Yamatai.

Could we add the location struct fields to the starship: namespace? Please and thank you.

 

[Locked_0ut]

Some are, they're way at the bottom under the Ys

 

[hyralt]

Based on Wes’ announcement, I guess some were in the starship namespace and others were in starships.

 

[Ametheliana]

I don't see Wes' announcement, would you relay it?

Personally I consider starships to not be locations. A starbase maybe as it's relatively stationary. But a starship is constantly moving locations. I don't see it logically fitting into location as it's not in a particular position or place for long AND because it's already able to be a plot on the wiki, too. Does one type of wiki need a third namespace it can be in? Don't mind me rubbing my two cents together, though, if you're dedicated to it.

 

[Wes]

I've implemented the suggestion. You can move your starship around on the map by updating its struct fields.

I don't see Wes' announcement, would you relay it?

Personally I consider starships to not be locations. A starbase maybe as it's relatively stationary. But a starship is constantly moving locations. I don't see it logically fitting into location as it's not in a particular position or place for long AND because it's already able to be a plot on the wiki, too. Does one type of wiki need a third namespace it can be in? Don't mind me rubbing my two cents together, though, if you're dedicated to it.

Yeah, but if you don't have it as a location then you can't assign a character to that location when it's in the middle of space.

 

[Ametheliana]

Yeah the cost/benefit weighs out to that being really cool if you can move them around on the map. Rad!