CNN recently posted this article: What if the government guaranteed you an income? I think this article is very relevant to the futuristic setting of Star Army. Read it!
Technology continues to improve and industry is increasingly automated. Robots are beginning to fulfill their promise of doing our work for us, but the rewards of that development are still being hoarded by the very, very rich and the increasingly unemployed and underemployed are getting paid worse than they have in a very long time. If we project this trend into the far future of Star Army, then we have entire industries being mostly automated, like asteroid mining, farming, cleaning things, and untold numbers of other jobs, particularly the ones nobody wanted to do anyway. And the population will continue to grow as well. Without a change, we end up with people competing over the meager offering of jobs that remain, in a market where employers can treat their employees like dirt because employees are easy to replace. We end up in a world like Elysium where a tiny percentage of the population have all the money and live in paradise while the working class lives in an overcrowded dump.
The concept is of a minimum income simple: If everyone had enough income to survive, then people can do what they want to do, and nobody has to die on a street corner because they can't afford food. Businesses benefit from a consumer base that isn't struggling just to meet basic needs.
Yamatai seems likely to adopt a measure like this. Currently Yamatai provides free housing (including utilities like water, power, and networking) and free medical care. Like the question: "Why are there starving people in America when we have a large surplus of food?" the answer is a matter of distribution.
What do you think?
Technology continues to improve and industry is increasingly automated. Robots are beginning to fulfill their promise of doing our work for us, but the rewards of that development are still being hoarded by the very, very rich and the increasingly unemployed and underemployed are getting paid worse than they have in a very long time. If we project this trend into the far future of Star Army, then we have entire industries being mostly automated, like asteroid mining, farming, cleaning things, and untold numbers of other jobs, particularly the ones nobody wanted to do anyway. And the population will continue to grow as well. Without a change, we end up with people competing over the meager offering of jobs that remain, in a market where employers can treat their employees like dirt because employees are easy to replace. We end up in a world like Elysium where a tiny percentage of the population have all the money and live in paradise while the working class lives in an overcrowded dump.
The concept is of a minimum income simple: If everyone had enough income to survive, then people can do what they want to do, and nobody has to die on a street corner because they can't afford food. Businesses benefit from a consumer base that isn't struggling just to meet basic needs.
If the only reason you work is because you must work to survive, and you can only make enough to survive, never making enough to earn your way out of the system, isn't that basically slavery? It certainly isn't freedom. A minimum income would allow people to do what they want to do.The benefits of a basic income on a national scale would be wide-ranging. First, there's the lift to the overall economy if everyone has money to spend. Next, there are the obvious psychological benefits of knowing you can always afford food and shelter. Then there's the societal stability factor: If people's basic economic needs are being met—no matter what the unpredictable job market is doing—we don't have to worry about the potential for civil unrest as a result of mass unemployment.
Yamatai seems likely to adopt a measure like this. Currently Yamatai provides free housing (including utilities like water, power, and networking) and free medical care. Like the question: "Why are there starving people in America when we have a large surplus of food?" the answer is a matter of distribution.
What do you think?