• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at stararmy@gmail.com or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy

[Abwehran] D-D Main Fusion Reactor

Abwehran Commander

Inactive Member
The newest power source for the Abwehrans, the D-D Fusion Reactor (or Deuterium-Deuterium Fusion Reactor) is able to generate much more power than the previous Fission-Fusion Reactor and Fusions Reactor (Deuterium-Helium Three Fusion).

While this is a relatively common technology in SARP, it has never been explained properly. After a couple of months of research, I determined that the usual method of Abwehran Fusion had been Deuterium (Heavy Water) and Helium Three because of its proximity to a gas giant. This meant there was still a fusion reactor that was a step above. Thus, the newest Abwehran Reactor (in order to phase out the Fission-Fusion monstrosity) would be a system using Deuterium entirely.
 
This review is for: [https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=abwehran:d-d_main_fusion_reactor]
[Abwehran] D-D Main Fusion Reactor[/url]


The submitted article is/has…
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ ] Artwork (illustrations are strongly encouraged for all spacecraft and handheld items)
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[x] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[x] Obtusely redundant
[x] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[x] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[x] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[x] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[x] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[x] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[x] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[x] Lacking Detail
[x] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[x] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[x] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[x] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.

Status: Approved

I intend to finish this review by: DONE
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…