• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 July 2024 is YE 46.5 in the RP.

[Abwehran] Lowenhertz IIB-class Destroyer

Abwehran Commander

Inactive Member
A Test Bed for possible refit, the Model B of the Lowenhertz II-class Destroyer was designed to be the Plot Ship of the New Abwehran Plot coming soon. I've tried to point out the differences between the original as well as possible, but if there are still some problems, please notify me.

It is using the Mark II Combat Drone, which has yet to be accepted.
 
This review is for: Lowenhertz IIb-class Destroyer

The submitted article is/has…
[X] A general topic sentence under the title header
[X] Artwork (illustrations are strongly encouraged for all spacecraft and handheld items)
[X] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[X] In the proper format/template
[X] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[X] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[X] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[X] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[X] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[X] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[X] Obtusely redundant
[X] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[X] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[X] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[X] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[X] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[X] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[X] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[X]Lacking Detail

The article has…
[?] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[X] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[X] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[?] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary

N/A

Status: Approved.

Notes

Military ships require a civilian ship submission to accompany it, normally. But this is a modification of an existing design that adds literally less than ten lines of text, so I'm hoping that Wes will agree with my decision to waive the usual requirement.
 
Works for me, I guess.

More civilian designs are always welcome, though.
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top