I'll just do this for Wes as I've read the article.
This review is for: Asterian Order of the Knight Marshal with URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:asteria:order_of_the_knight_marshal
The submitted article is/has…
[^^] A very high level of overall quality
[^^] A general topic sentence under the title header
[^^] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[^^] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[^^] In the proper format/template
[^^] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[^^] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[^^] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[^^] No red and/or broken links
[^^] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[^^] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[^^] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[^^] Obtusely redundant
[^^] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[^^] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[^^] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[^^] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[^^] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[^^] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[^^] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[^^] Lacking Detail
[^^] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[n/a] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[n/a] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[^^] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[^^] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Approved