• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at stararmy@gmail.com or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy

Approved Submission [Bladeworks Product] Walter Hyde's Custom Melee Weapon

This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
Link Ke-M2-4 Mindy and Star Army Blue.

This is how to link tier:
Code:
**Purpose:** [[(wiki link back to this article's Tier heading)|(weapon's purpose, i.e.: Light Anti-Mecha)]]
 
Update: Linked the right armor, however Star Army Blue doesn't exist on the wiki. I don't really know if we should go out of our way to give Star Army Blue its own article. XD
 
Is this...











Is this a RWBY reference

I’d suggest lowering the tier by 1 so you can spam a few of these and complete the dream.
 
This review is for: Walter Hyde's Custom Melee Weapon With URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=items:walter_joseph_hyde:star_servantine

The submitted article is/has…
[✓] A very high level of overall quality
[✓] A general topic sentence under the title header
[] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[✓] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[✓] In the proper format/template
[✓] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[✓] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[✓] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[✓] No red and/or broken links
[✓] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[✓] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[✓] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[✓] Obtusely redundant
[✓] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[✓] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[✓] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[✓] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[✓] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[✓] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[✓] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[✓] Lacking Detail
[✓] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[n/a] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[✓] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[✓] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ @Kai do you have any thoughts on nomenclature being used? ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.

Pending: nomenclature
 
Because it's a custom ordered weapon, and not a serially mass-produced item, it doesn't really have or need any naming nomenclature. at least, that's my thoughts on the matter.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…