I agree, which is why I provided links to my concerns. If you want proof to the conflict of interest, then I'd be willing to ask Wes if there could be some screenshots from certain incidents that back-up this potential conflict of interest. In particular, slandering of another NTSE staff member and insisting to "always go through Cadet". It might not have been in direct relation to this specific corporation, but there is evidence to easily suggest a conflict of interest here. It'd also implicate quite a few other people, however, so I'd rather not have to start posting these screenshots and simply ask that they admit it and simply step down from their "rightful" defensive position.We cannot keep avoiding one reviewer or another, or call out for bias one reviewer or another, in the way we've been doing.
You have got to trust the NTSE mods to do their job, and they need to talk to each other and call each other out -- privately -- to make sure they are respecting the institution and powers therein.
Unless there's clear, linkable evidence, this calling out has got to stop.
I agree, which is why I provided links to my concerns. If you want proof to the conflict of interest, then I'd be willing to ask Wes if there could be some screenshots from certain incidents that back-up this potential conflict of interest. In particular, slandering of another NTSE staff member and insisting to "always go through Cadet". It might not have been in direct relation to this specific corporation, but there is evidence to easily suggest a conflict of interest here. It'd also implicate quite a few other people, however, so I'd rather not have to start posting these screenshots and simply ask that they admit it and simply step down from their "rightful" defensive position.
I call people out when it's due. And in this situation, it's greatly due. So if you want to plead for evidence, then I'll use this chance to make sure @Wes sees this. It would involve roughly 3-4 screenshots submitted to you before hand. If people want to act like this isn't the truth of the matter, that there's clear NTSE bias, then I'll simply give a reality check the likes of which hasn't been seen before.
I don't want drama. I want the NTSE to be trustworthy. So give me a reason to put faith in it. I'd rather not have to share things that would expose some very bad sides of some members that they showed to quite a many other member in a "not so private" chat.
Edit: Honestly, it shows a bad light on more than just these few. Especially as there were many others who have knowledge of this and are blindly ignoring it/not caring that there's clear attempts to bypass proper NTSE vetting. So I hope that this really isn't the route that the accused party intends to follow.
I'm pretty sure you were in the PM chains where Cadet has demonstrated that he should be nowhere near this submission or any related to Zen/Blacks/Neo-Jiyuu due to his literal bullying of a duly appointed FM.Show them already.
I'm personally tired of these screenshots being used as a veiled threat. If they're so damaging, let the damage be done so the healing can begin.
I mean, that's what you say. But I know you know what I'm talking about. Regardless of whether any proof of Cadet's bias is provided, arguing against something you know to be true is devious and unhealthy for the community.I'm encouraging the opposite. If we're going to threaten people with screenshots and other evidence, let's see it. Let's be transparent and honest.
Legix is working on that, so I'm happy to wait.
Zen falls under the purview of Nepleslian FMs and your suggestion now, as well as past attempts to assert otherwise via private bullying, proves why you shouldn't review this stuff. It's a core part of the Nepleslian setting, dude.it's all Zen's stuff
And that's why you shouldn't review it. You believe certain, obviously biased things and will approve anything your cronies put up for review, regardless of their quality or if what they're doing is allowed.As far as I was concerned, this article was purely a Zen issue.
1: I'd like to figure out whether it is or isn't going to be treated as a separate company. The wording and other submissions give mixed signals on this, including prior corporations/factions that have existed as a baseline for possibilities of how this could be angled.
2: I'd hope it'd be sub-dividing on the majority, as it's considered a subsidiary, so this really isn't a concern. Unless the entire staff was formed via colonists versus promoting/core personnel being transferred, then I guess I'd have a concern with Zen Arms entrusting desperate colonists and potential enemies (based on the system's submission defense of "an enemy of my enemy" being about the only reason Jiyuu colonists were trusted by the Black Syndicate that the corp is based in) with manufacturing plants without the supervision of trusted employees.
3: It's got a single line stating it was partially worked on during YE 38 and then suddenly it was producing various "common components" for high-end production. On top of that, it's supposedly on its way to something greater, as the wiki says. This is part of what you asked to remove, but it'd be nice for it to be whether this is a new and under-prepared branch or some "invest everything" offshoot. So, with that said? This concern isn't really that simple. It's simply wanting clarification for just how well off they are, as the writing has mixed signals on its relative/overall success.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?