• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at stararmy@gmail.com or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy

Denado Refining ship

Ira

Ser Spit
Inactive Member
Submission Type: Civilian Ship
Submission URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=ga ... e_refinery

Faction: Gartagen Union
FM Approved Yet? Yes

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles? Yes, the Leono Corvette: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=ga ... pace_miner
Previously Submitted? No

Notes: I have often talked about Gartagen mining Operations. I need more civilian ships, and this certainly will put some definition on it. The ship is large, but it only has defensive weapons making it prime civilian material.
 
Look good overall, although there are some blank sections:

Statistics and Performance
Inside the Ship
Compartment Layouts
Ship Systems
 
Those sections were intended to break up the article a bit. For clarification purposes I added a little blurb stating that the section is.
 
Review in Progress will be completed 12/28
 
This review is for: Denado Mobile Refinery

The submitted article is/has…
[x] A very high level of overall quality
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Obtusely redundant
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Lacking Detail
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[IN-COMPLIANCE] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[IN-COMPLIANCE] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[IN-COMPLIANCE] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Note here if any serious issues are present. These are the issues that will hold up approval.
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.

Status: Approved.

Notes
This field is for any extra description needed for the issues stated above or (as the name suggests) and additional notes you wish to state in the record regarding the item.

I intend to finish this review by: COMPLETED
 
One thing I did want to suggest here is that you consider making some standard interiors for civilian vessels so that you can link then into your submissions.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…