Do I support Star Army's use of AI art?
I think that is generally fine. The "it's good when you sort of know what you want" statement really resonated with me because that's how I use it: to generate a lot of slop and pick something close enough to my character out after already having an established and unique character aesthetic. Every time I've tried to have the AI transmute my words into something novel from my mind's eye, the result falls flat.In summary: AI generated images are welcome on my RP site, but human-made art is preferred. We've embraced this phenomenon while still supporting human artists. AI art is a supplement to human art, not a replacement.
Actually, a lot of AI artwork infringes on legal copyright! Alex's example of shows and movie scenes being replicated 1:1 are good examples of illegal use of copyrighted material.AI art is legal.
βThe protection of The Timesβs intellectual property is critical to its continued ability to fund world-class journalism in the public interest,β the lawsuit states. βIf The Times and its peers cannot control the use of their content, their ability to monetize that content will be harmed. With less revenue, news organizations will have fewer journalists able to dedicate time and resources to important, in-depth stories, which creates a risk that those stories will go untold. Less journalism will be produced, and the cost to society will be enormous.β
I will 95% cosign this sentimentIt's something that brings me a lot of joy, but when people use ChatGPT I just want to (and usually do) just go past it. There's no bigger let down than seeing one of my favorite SARP writers use ChatGPT for RP and that's probably a tough pill for a few of my friends to swallow.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?