Star Army
Star ArmyⓇ is a landmark of forum roleplaying. Opened in 2002, Star Army is like an internet clubhouse for people who love roleplaying, art, and worldbuilding. Anyone 18 or older may join for free. New members are welcome! Use the "Register" button below.
Note: This is a play-by-post RPG site. If you're looking for the tabletop miniatures wargame "5150: Star Army" instead, see Two Hour Wargames.
-
If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
-
Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
Edjia Battle rifle(Gartagens)
- Thread starter Ira
- Start date
- Could you put it in the standard weapon template?
- YE 34 should be linked.
- Could you use a transparent background for the art please?
- There is a red link at the bottom.
- Rifles, in general, should be PDR 3. See Damage Rating.
- YE 34 should be linked.
- Could you use a transparent background for the art please?
- There is a red link at the bottom.
- Rifles, in general, should be PDR 3. See Damage Rating.
- Article is now in standard template
- YE 34 is now linked.
- Transparent Background: I do not know how I am not that artsy, no very savvy on using art programs.
- Red link is now gone from the article.
- Rifles being PDR 3 I must cry that statement is false, citing this : https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=nm ... beam_rifle
With the explanation that this weapon is not an Assault Rifle it is a Battle rifle It is a larger weapon with that use more powerful rounds then its smaller cousins. However I am not unreasonable and I have knocked down the PDR of the weapon to be PDR 4
- YE 34 is now linked.
- Transparent Background: I do not know how I am not that artsy, no very savvy on using art programs.
- Red link is now gone from the article.
- Rifles being PDR 3 I must cry that statement is false, citing this : https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=nm ... beam_rifle
With the explanation that this weapon is not an Assault Rifle it is a Battle rifle It is a larger weapon with that use more powerful rounds then its smaller cousins. However I am not unreasonable and I have knocked down the PDR of the weapon to be PDR 4
This review is for: Edjia Battle Rifle
The submitted article is/has…
[x] A very high level of overall quality
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[OK] Obtusely redundant
[OK] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[OK] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[OK] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[OK] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[OK] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[OK] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[OK] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[OK] Lacking Detail
[OK] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[N/A] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[OK] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[OK] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Summary
Damage Rating as mentioned by Wes..
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.
Status: Pending
Notes
Referencing the NMX rifle does not assist your arguement. If the DR is changed to PDR 3 as Wes requested, I will approve this article.
I intend to finish this review by
ENDING YOUR CHANGES.
The submitted article is/has…
[x] A very high level of overall quality
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[OK] Obtusely redundant
[OK] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[OK] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[OK] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[OK] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[OK] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[OK] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[OK] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[OK] Lacking Detail
[OK] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[N/A] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[OK] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[OK] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Summary
Damage Rating as mentioned by Wes..
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.
Status: Pending
Notes
Referencing the NMX rifle does not assist your arguement. If the DR is changed to PDR 3 as Wes requested, I will approve this article.
I intend to finish this review by
ENDING YOUR CHANGES.
