Edjia Battle rifle(Gartagens)

- Could you put it in the standard weapon template?
- YE 34 should be linked.
- Could you use a transparent background for the art please?
- There is a red link at the bottom.
- Rifles, in general, should be PDR 3. See Damage Rating.

- Article is now in standard template
- YE 34 is now linked.
- Transparent Background: I do not know how I am not that artsy, no very savvy on using art programs.
- Red link is now gone from the article.
- Rifles being PDR 3 I must cry that statement is false, citing this : https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=nm ... beam_rifle

With the explanation that this weapon is not an Assault Rifle it is a Battle rifle It is a larger weapon with that use more powerful rounds then its smaller cousins. However I am not unreasonable and I have knocked down the PDR of the weapon to be PDR 4

Andrew fixed the image for me to conform to what you requested wes.

This review is for: Edjia Battle Rifle

The submitted article is/has…
[x] A very high level of overall quality
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[OK] Obtusely redundant
[OK] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[OK] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[OK] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[OK] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[OK] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[OK] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[OK] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[OK] Lacking Detail
[OK] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[N/A] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[DAMAGE RATING NOT IN COMPLIANCE] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[OK] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[OK] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Damage Rating as mentioned by Wes..
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.

Status: Pending

Notes
Referencing the NMX rifle does not assist your arguement. If the DR is changed to PDR 3 as Wes requested, I will approve this article.

4. It is not a valid argument to justify overpowered or questionable abilities on your submission by…

• pointing to an older submission, especially one of a different faction
• promising in-universe restrictions on use or availability

Click to expand...

I intend to finish this review byENDING YOUR CHANGES.

DR has been adjusted.