Approved Submission FLOW

This appears to be the same as, or nearly the same as, one of your earlier works you did for Origin; The Silhouette

What makes this thing different than its predecessor, and why would we need it if something nearly identical already exists?

It isn't specifically designed for use in armour. That is a thing its capable of, yes, but it augments the users intelligence in ways normally only possible with synthetic intelligence for better decision making. There's also the networking and scalability, you must understand.

This isn't something specific to the cockpit, like Silhouette: This is a whole paradigm of systems control and arguably to become part of the backbone of how the consortium (a group which relies enormously on automation) is to function.

Would you be okay with some RP crossover, indicating the same person wrote both systems (thus showing their similarities)?

I'm dying to do some collaboration with you and Origin, Kai. You decide the need and its required stats and I'll make the imagery and the tech blurb behind it. I hate writing stats.

Kai?

Sorry, I've been busy running some RP threads. Also, I'm not actually a tech mod, so you need to get someone else to do that. I don't see any problem with explaining that it was the same person that made both systems, since you made both of them anyway. You've mostly addressed my concerns, although I will admit that I have adapted and borrowed things from the Silhouette to perform these exact functions in systems like the FATE IES and the Consort AI that was developed with it and now used to control the Mimicom Android.

That's fine: We'll be doing the same with ARIA. It'll be fun going toe to toe with you at some point in the future.

Bump.

Its been about a month.

Review in process. Checklist will be posted later today.

This review is for: FLOW

The submitted article is/has…
[X] A very high level of overall quality
[X] A general topic sentence under the title header
[NA] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[X] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[X] In the proper format/template
[X] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[X] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[X] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[X] No red and/or broken links
[X] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[X] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[X] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[X] Obtusely redundant
[X] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[X] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[X] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[X] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[X] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[X] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[X] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[X] Lacking Detail
[NA] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[NA] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[NA] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[X] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[X] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Note here if any serious issues are present. These are the issues that will hold up approval.
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.

Status: Approved.

Notes
This field is for any extra description needed for the issues stated above or (as the name suggests) and additional notes you wish to state in the record regarding the item.

I intend to finish this review by: Complete