Before the review, I want to commend you on a well-written article. It is short and sweet and that would blacks nomenclature I don't think I'm going to insist on that. The nomenclature Wiki does not contain a designation for software, but even then you posted it version number. If you feel inclined you may give this a nomenclature as Electronics, but even then it is not a tangible product and would not completely fit the bill seeing as any electronic device could host the AI, so long as it meets the required benchmarks.
Also, as long as the moderator you request does not have any bias in the submission there has never been any ruling specifically stating that you cannot request a specific moderator. I personally have requested moderators that I knew had a better working knowledge of my submission than myself to ensure accurate portrayal on my own part. All of us moderators are following the same guidelines and checklist and are equally capable of hosting a review, so please, don't feel shy.
This review is for: Dusk AI
The submitted article is/has…
[ ✔] A very high level of overall quality
[✔ ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[✔ ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ ✔] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[ ✔] In the proper format/template
[✔ ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[✔ ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[✔ ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[✔ ] No red and/or broken links
[✔ ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[✔ ] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[✔ ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ ✔] Obtusely redundant
[✔ ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[✔ ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[✔ ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[✔ ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[✔ ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[✔ ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ ✔] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ ✔] Lacking Detail
[✔ ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[ ✔] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ ✔] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[✔ ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ ✔] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Summary
** There is nothing specifically unique about artificial intelligence like this and it easily fits the setting.
Status: Approved.