• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at stararmy@gmail.com or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy

[Iromakuanhe] Raevr VANDR

This review is for: So-M2-1A Raevr VANDR

The submitted article is/has…
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x] Artwork (illustrations are strongly encouraged for all spacecraft and handheld items)
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[x] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[x] Obtusely redundant
[x] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[x] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[x] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[x] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[x] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[x] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[x] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[-] Lacking Detail
[x] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[x] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[x] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[x] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[x] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Note here if any serious issues are present. These are the issues that will hold up approval.
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.

Status: Pending

Notes
This field is for any extra description needed for the issues stated above or (as the name suggests) and additional notes you wish to state in the record regarding the item.
RV-I VecTran Node System [VNS]
A couple small concerns.
1) You do not provide any 'fail safes' such as how is equipment kept in this pocket dimension when the Mech is powered down.
2) Or what will happen if the containment system is damaged.

(If a military starship) URL of accompanying civilian ship is: Name of civilian ship

I intend to finish this review by: Completed
 
Overall very good.
I fixed a number of Typos, and ignored global variances in words.

But I do have a concern with

RV-I VecTran Node System [VNS]

Not with the concept, but that there is nothing in the article that says how the system maintains the pocket when the unit is powered down. And what happens if the containment system is damaged.
 
I made some fixes to the VNS sub-section.

The 'damage' mentioned by the safety should be determined by the GM. I said 'light' so it'd be clear enough that it wouldn't cripple or destroy a unit.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…