Okay ... I've got about half an hour, and I want to get into nitpicky shit because, well, I like guns.
So, without further ado.
1. Price -- is that in KS, or Resource Points?
2. 6.67 x 18.96 mm round is about .26-caliber. Any particular reason you're using that?
3. Having seen the look of the weapon, I think I get the purpose of the design. However, I wonder if you are forgetting the balance of the weapon -- everything is in back, and with the carbine model, and the ranges you have dialed in, I'd worry this baby would be a bitch to handle. Obviously a big Lorath wouldn't have a problem ... but you might want to sell this to civilians someday. *wink wink* Basically, the concern is about the material used -- ceramics in a weapon that isn't balanced in the center seems like a bad plan.
4. The separate propellant magazine is ingenious. I hate the idea of carrying around one more fucking thing, yet if you want the ultimate in modular, versitile weaponry (complete with varying range and hitting power), it makes perfect sense.
5. Is there anything ejected from this weapon? Case or what have you? I know it's caseless ammo ... just want to be sure.
6. 50 cm is tiny. The extendable stock, however, is what I assume to be 16.6 cm, by your math? Nice length on it. Is it a wire or a solid stock?
7. Pretty small difference in weight between the rifle and the compact. And a big jump to the heavy weights. Interesting.
8. Can you explain the sections of maximum effective ranges? I have a feeling I get Area, Point and Suppression, but I'm not sure.
9. I would remove the ranges between bipod and without. Focus on the range of round itself, as humans can sometimes outdo a bi-pod, and theoretically it doesn't add any more effective range anyway -- it just makes it easier to shoot.
10. Why is it not safe to fire fully automatic with the sharpshooter variant? Are the barrels between all four variants different besides their length? As in, is one thicker than the other, or carries a different length-of-twist, or maybe made with a different material or production technique?
11. Remove the semi-automatic firing rate UNLESS the disconnector and recoil system of this weapon somehow truly limit it to that. I highly doubt it does -- I bet I could bumpfire this thing faster than 75 rpm.
12. Can you explain the difference between Automatic, Sustained and Cyclic? Again, I think I know, but to be sure.
13. Under muzzle velocity, do you mean the M12 or the M7?
14. The maximums are fucking hot on this gun. Seriously hot. I wouldn't touch a gun that fired a round -- on full auto -- at more than 2,000 m/s. That's fucking sick.
15. Thank you for the note about the recoil. I was going to say, this fucker would break your goddamn shoulder like that.
16. Is an explosive and frangible round really necessary for something that's only .26-caliber? I mean, I guess the round's pretty long at nearly 19 mm ... but still. Fuck.
17. Again, love the propellant system. About 150 rounds is pretty good, actually. Firing in a vacuum, too! Yukari NEEEEEEDS one of these.
18. Under firing mechanism -- you mean magazine, not clip.
19. So if this gun has no propellant charge, does the electrical parts of it not work either?
20. Where is the Type-D sight rail located? I'm a little confused because you say a flashlight could go up there.
21. ... Okay, I have nothing else. Other than some typos. But they can wait. SERIOUSLY, Yukari would drool for this.