Star Army

Star ArmyⓇ is a landmark of forum roleplaying. Opened in 2002, Star Army is like an internet clubhouse for people who love roleplaying, art, and worldbuilding. Anyone 18 or older may join for free. New members are welcome! Use the "Register" button below.

Note: This is a play-by-post RPG site. If you're looking for the tabletop miniatures wargame "5150: Star Army" instead, see Two Hour Wargames.

  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 January 2025 is YE 47.1 in the RP.

On Hold Nekovalkyrja Operating System

This is an highly incomplete article and its contents directly conflict with approved materials about the version of Kessaku OS used for Neko present on various Nekovalkyrja species articles. It needs a lot of work before approval.

A lot of the incorrect information stems from the fact it was written largely by a GM whose plot centered around using the Neko OS as a mystery macguffin. Check the changelog. That plot was never finished, and those elements don’t make much sense in the context of the wider setting.
 
This needs heavy editing and rework. For example, it lists NH-2 as unknowable when I know NH-2 this much about them: "The first nekos were the NK-2 and NH-2, which were made to combat the new "Seraph" organic weapons of the Elysians. The NH-2 proved to be successful, but limited, and so PNUgen created the NH-7 Nekovalkyrja II." and their complete physical appearance.

While this proposed article says "The Technical Manual is the only text available that even relates to Neko history, but it provides no salient clues. It states that 20 years passed between the NH-2, the prototype series, to the NH-7 mass-production model. Changes were widespread, according to the manual, but without knowing what the NH-2 was like, the listed changes lack context."

I know more than the wiki does on the matter and that should not be the case. It's an article that isn't omniscient but adds more questions than answers and, therefore, I think that to consider approval it should be completely reworked into something that adds to the setting rather than detracts.
 
Respect the initiative, but to be honest without saying too much, there are WES THINGS and SETTING MANAGEMENT THINGS that make the timing not great.
 
This was discussed with @Wes last night. He's got a lot on his plate right now. So it will be put on hold until he has the bandwidth to do something with it.
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top