Rejected Submission New ITC Tech

Please use the submission template.

Also, there are problems with this submission, other than the lack of any information on range, there is also nothing that states how 'long' the system can last; just to name a few. Not only that, but why is this written to be on par with a military piece of technology when the company still doesn't have adequete RP to back it up?

Could you be more specific on what exactly is wrong? That would a be great help.

Also, if you are speaking of the military hardware or rather 'ship' that the system is gonna fit in, I'm working on that "story arc".

Edit: did I not use that template? Sorry my bad if I wasn't. I'll get it fixed right away.

A navigation module is normally separate from sensors. For example I worked on the AWADS Adverse Weather Aerial Delivery System, while in the air force. It was a sophisticated system that could theoretically allow a C-130 to take off, fly to a target and deliver by parachute, troops or equipment with zero visibility.

This system consisted on a Navigation unit that did all the calculations, it was paired with a ground mapping radar that the navigator would use to provide the exact position of the craft by making known landmarks.

This is some sort of ground navigation system, how is it going to see ahead to five miles? A high PRF radar can give you some good details, but the limitations you have about moisture don't apply.

Bottom line you need details. How does this system a map, especially since its ground you have to worry about elevation. A large hill or a large rock outcropping in front of you is going to create a blind spot.

You need to figure out how this is going to work. Also unless the vehicle this is in is operated on batteries only, the problem of the drain is a non-issue. The vehicle should have an electrical system that can supply this or have an auxiliary system to provide the necessary power.

So I've edited and added a lot of stuff. Go check it out and tell me what you think.

Also, don't hesitate to remove any typos.

@Yoerik - are you still interested in this? If not, I'll have to have this rejected in 3 days. Keep in mind that if an article sits a bit, it's ok to start asking for it to be reviewed. It doesn't have to just sit. Even after rejection though, you can always re-submit as many times as you'd like.