That is not worth mentioning because, frankly, RP interpretation and the commonly-accepted vision is more important than details that slipped through the logic filter 10 years ago.Its also worth mentioning that you're kind of going backwards. You're using RP and pictures to determine the characteristics of something, but in reality if they're different from the page that means they misinterpreted the item.
No that's not exactly true. RP interpretation is a reason something -could- be changed. But RP interpretation does not override actual intention when it comes to rewriting the article itself, especially when the 'problem' you bring up has already been solved.That is not worth mentioning because, frankly, RP interpretation and the commonly-accepted vision is more important than details that slipped through the logic filter 10 years ago.
I mean, you can say that, but it hasn't been solved at all. Moreover, according to what Fred says, the FM didn't even think the Daisy should be as big as it apparently is.No that's not exactly true. RP interpretation is a reason something -could- be changed. But RP interpretation does not override actual intention when it comes to rewriting the article itself, especially when the 'problem' you bring up has already been solved.
The Daisy 2 exist. It's already smaller. So yes, the 'problem' is fixed. There is a smaller daisy that works for smaller people. But just like the Mindy, if we don't have a bigger armor around people will be forced to use MCAS. So why alter the Daisy1's article when it can be used to support larger character that do not want to go through the hassle of designing a MCAS.I mean, you can say that, but it hasn't been solved at all. Moreover, according to what Fred says, the FM didn't even think the Daisy should be as big as it apparently is.
We fix tech all the time. What's the opposition to fixing this?
No, I've addressed it by saying that the Daisy 2 generally hasn't been adopted by the wider Star Army. It's probably due to the fact it was introduced during the time when Yamatai and Origin had "burned bridges," and was never picked up on a widespread basis after the relationship was mended. And I don't think using the YSS Eucharis inventory page as an example is picking some GM who "just didn't notice."You've 'addressed' it by saying "it should be on the damage guide"
Then there is nothing to address, Daisy2 is what you use for small people, Daisy1 is big and bulky, and totally possible if you looked at the video I posted it shows exactly how it can be done. As the Daisy1 is discontinued there is zero reason to modify the article. Also 'non-relevant' PA can be used as examples, as the M1 Demon is on the list and that's from YE26. Also there is no need to act like it's "too big to be PA' because Nam has much bigger PAs so it's not as if there's some limitation keeping it from being that large as well. Also the Daisy1 wasn't 'accidentally' oversized or anything like that it was -intended- to be that large from the get go, so it's not as if it 'slipped by' It was approved as how it was intended. Plenty of people forget that the Aggressor is like 11 feet tall, when RPing, but no one goes back and changes the article for it, because that's the players mistake not a mistake in the article.No, I've addressed it by saying that the Daisy 2 generally hasn't been adopted by the wider Star Army. It's probably due to the fact it was introduced during the time when Yamatai and Origin had "burned bridges," and was never picked up on a widespread basis after the relationship was mended. And I don't think using the YSS Eucharis inventory page as an example is picking some GM who "just didn't notice."
But, again, the Daisy 2 has been addressed earlier in the thread toward Fred's statements. So please refrain from starting arguments about stuff that's already been covered. Thanks.
Untrue. The Daisy 2 is an infrequently used offshoot that can fit individuals just as big as the Daisy 1A, which is still the Star Army Rikugun's main planetary combat power armor.Daisy2 is what you use for small people, Daisy1 is big and bulky
Untrue. The M6-1B and M6-1C are discontinued. The M6-1A remains in production.As the Daisy1 is discontinued there is zero reason to modify the article
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?