Shaika Assault Carrier [Update]

I forgot to add that new artwork has been ordered.

Almost done, will finish this review while I am at work.

This review is for: Na-AC-02a Shaika Assault Carrier

The submitted article is/has…
[x] A very high level of overall quality
[x] A general topic sentence under the title header
[x On Order] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[x] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[x] In the proper format/template
[x] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[x] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[x] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[x] No red and/or broken links
[x] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[x] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[IN COMPLIANCE] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[IN COMPLIANCE] Obtusely redundant
[IN COMPLIANCE] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[IN COMPLIANCE] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[IN COMPLIANCE] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[IN COMPLIANCE] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[IN COMPLIANCE] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[IN COMPLIANCE] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[IN COMPLIANCE] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ ] Lacking Detail
[ ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[IN COMPLIANCE] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[IN COMPLIANCE] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[IN COMPLIANCE] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[IN COMPLIANCE] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Note here if any serious issues are present. These are the issues that will hold up approval.
** Short description of the issue. If a longer explanation is needed, put it in Notes.

Status: Main Article Approved

Notes
Unapproved Sub-article pending in NTSE.

I intend to finish this review by: COMPLETED