Ive fixed the two nomenclature for the two submitted and will take under advisement the rest at a later date when I have more time. Frankly, I still see little actual use for the nomenclature until the day wes makes some fancy AI-created thing where you pick the nomenclature combination and it shows you the article and is currently just an annoying thing to try to figure out nomenclature helper or not.
As for
being in the title ive added the nomenclature back to the statistics part but I hardly think
this
View attachment 21029
Fits in the rulebreaking category of
being in the title and it harms nothing to remain there as well as in the statistical information because I like my little box at the top of all my shasta articles.