No.
This side-project has been fun but after half a dozen iterative changes based on unofficial feedback from the reviewer the energy expended is way beyond the return expected. The only reason it has been kept from approval is because the reviewer doesn't like the way words have placed on the article, and moved, and sliced, and moved again, and redone, and moved again based on their own feedback.
The article already is more than up-to-spec with what the reviewer has asked for, and has been since very early in writing. Almost every new change since early development has simply been moving sentences around in a, apparently meaningless, attempt to appease the reviewer. Unfortunately, this project is no longer the fun side-project it started as, being a very simple concept that has had the book thrown at it for no reason I can discern except the reviewers own grammatical taste.
Everything listed as a problem item by the reviewer is already in place in the article. Repeated attempts to fix the article have only resulted in vague, continued complaints of it not being palatable enough from the reviewer themselves.
Unless a new reviewer comes to oversee this thread, this project is dead. That is all.