This is not a major complaint, but I was just wondering if we should implement a supplement speed rating of m/s or km/s for new submissions?
This is not a demand to slow things down, but I believe with the current system of Mach, and C people are losing sight just of how fast these speeds actually are. These ratings do not have to be dead accurate, but used as a reminder to the designer of just how much is too much.
Case in point, Mach is not a very good system, oneupmanship means people will just tack on an extra unit to make it faster, but at Mach 3 (1029m/s) you're already creating a pressure wave that can KILL people on the ground if you fly low enough. I shudder to think what Mach 6 (2058m/s, that's two kilometres a SECOND) would do.
In order to discover these speeds you can use a simple converter from the net, but I'm also willing to create a conversion table for the wiki if it helps. I just don't want to see people chucking around c like it's nothing.
Please consider.
This is not a demand to slow things down, but I believe with the current system of Mach, and C people are losing sight just of how fast these speeds actually are. These ratings do not have to be dead accurate, but used as a reminder to the designer of just how much is too much.
Case in point, Mach is not a very good system, oneupmanship means people will just tack on an extra unit to make it faster, but at Mach 3 (1029m/s) you're already creating a pressure wave that can KILL people on the ground if you fly low enough. I shudder to think what Mach 6 (2058m/s, that's two kilometres a SECOND) would do.
In order to discover these speeds you can use a simple converter from the net, but I'm also willing to create a conversion table for the wiki if it helps. I just don't want to see people chucking around c like it's nothing.
Please consider.