• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at stararmy@gmail.com or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy

Rejected Submission [Template] Arieg's High Complexity Star System Template

Arieg

DEFCON Everybody Dies
Submission Type: Star System Template
Submission URL(s)
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:ariegs_star_system_template_complex
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:link_to_planetary_data_page_here

Faction: N/A
FM Approved Yet? N/A
Faction requires art? N/A

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles? Links to art collection pages.
Contains New art? General use planet art.
Previously Submitted? No

Notes: As requested if I wanted to use a higher complexity layout for my star systems I've made this monster, effectively it is for those looking to achieve a higher level of detail on their work. Its a two part setup that places the empire, economic, and military information for a star system on one page and the general stellar and infrastructure data on another. I primarily did this to prevent the page from turning into a singular monster. Anyways discuss.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Kind of why some of us think that enforcing templates is a little silly, if it doesn't allow information to be conveyed in a more usable and readable manner.
 
I think the table is too wide.

Also, I'm not sure why this template is really necessary. We just made a star system template.
 
I sort of like this template, just add it as an optional one for those who want to use it?
 
Wes said:
I think the table is too wide.

Also, I'm not sure why this template is really necessary. We just made a star system template.
Click to expand...

Because its great for bare bones information... and nothing else, this one would be for those looking to go to the next level and of course completely optional.
 
I'm... Not sure how you couldn't just expand using the current template. It is a skeleton, yes, but you can give it flesh without making a new one.
 
Arbitrated said:
I'm... Not sure how you couldn't just expand using the current template. It is a skeleton, yes, but you can give it flesh without making a new one.
Click to expand...

Because I tend to get the whole 'Your not using the standard template' when I play with the existing ones, which is why this whole standard template business is ludicrous to begin with.
 
The idea with templates is that pages of the same type on the wiki should have their information organized in a common layout. Having more than one system template works against that.

For this reason, I'm rejecting this submission.

Note: People are already allowed to expand on the standard template appropriately in their submissions, eg. adding subsections, etc. Just do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…