As a player of the site, I will look over this abiding by the guidelines provided and the Checklist to ensure as unbiased an opinion as possible.
This review is for: Kernel Mini Missile Launcher
The submitted article is/has…
[ Y ] A very high level of overall quality
[ Y ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ N ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ Y ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[ Y ] In the proper format/template
[ ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
- subsystem of specific size - subsystem of a specific size.
- Each Cell is 180mm long on each face, and holds the missiles snugly. Comma unnecessary
- On each face there are slots and tabs that can attach to the sides of other cells. Comma missing after "Face"
- Attachment Hard Points. Hard Points should be hyphened
All suggested grammar edits were made to ease submitters workload. Done by Grammarly standards, American English per submitters native constant, Critical errors only.
[ Y ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[ Y ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link) Comment down below.
[ Y ] No red and/or broken links
[ Y ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ Y ] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[ N ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ N ] Obtusely redundant: Would suggest "Obtusely redundant for Faction in question" as an alternative question here.
[ N ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments. Is this necessarily bad?
[ N ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation: I recall seeing Zack give the go-ahead
[ N ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ N ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ N ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ N ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ N ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately: The Missiles but those are currently being submitted
[ N ] Lacking Detail: I fully understand the construction and use of this weapon system.
[ N/A ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed): No image.
The article has…
[ N/A ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ N/A ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ Y ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ Y ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Summary
** This seems fairly open and shut. I would be surprised if an NTSE Mod had an issue with this launcher
Status: N/A
I don't do it but I am probably going to start doing it, but find a youtube sound clip of the "Retort" of the weapon you are looking for and post it in, make it a clickable link. Merely a suggestion. I'm fairly sure that isn't against the rules.