• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 September 2023 is YE 45.7 in the RP.

Approved Submission Articles of Military Justice


Banned Member
This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
We don't need to bother ourselves with the "previously submitted" since I requested this be submitted separately. Will post my review after this.
And even then it still was a giant pill to swallow. Let's just get this over with.

This review is for: Place submission title here

The submitted article is/has…
[ YES ] A very high level of overall quality
[ YES ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ N/A ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ YES ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
  • Why does Yamatai still not have functional MP? IDK.
  • Sooo much reading.
[ YES ] In the proper format/template
  • uhhhhh i don't think there's a proper template for this
[ YES ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
  • At least, nothing blatant.
[ ??? ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
  • It's just lengthy.
[ YES ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ YES ] No red and/or broken links
[ YES ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ YES ] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[ NO ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
  • Because laws can be OP. :p
[ NO ] Obtusely redundant
[ NO ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ NO ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ NO ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ NO ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ NO ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ NO ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ NO ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ NO ] Lacking Detail
  • If anything, too much.
[ NO ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[ N/A ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ N/A ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ N/A ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ N/A ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.

Nothing too important. Laws are cool


I have finished this review on: (9/29/2017)
I will edit my post in Star Army Military Police Approval Thread to reflect this.
Last edited by a moderator: