What's new
  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 April 2024 is YE 46.3 in the RP.

Approved Submission Articles of Military Justice

Ethereal

Ethereal

Banned Member
Upvote 0 Downvote
This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
We don't need to bother ourselves with the "previously submitted" since I requested this be submitted separately. Will post my review after this.
 
And even then it still was a giant pill to swallow. Let's just get this over with.

This review is for: Place submission title here

The submitted article is/has…
[ YES ] A very high level of overall quality
[ YES ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ N/A ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ YES ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
  • Why does Yamatai still not have functional MP? IDK.
  • Sooo much reading.
[ YES ] In the proper format/template
  • uhhhhh i don't think there's a proper template for this
[ YES ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
  • At least, nothing blatant.
[ ??? ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
  • It's just lengthy.
[ YES ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ YES ] No red and/or broken links
[ YES ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ YES ] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[ NO ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
  • Because laws can be OP. :p
[ NO ] Obtusely redundant
[ NO ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ NO ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ NO ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ NO ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ NO ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ NO ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ NO ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ NO ] Lacking Detail
  • If anything, too much.
[ NO ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[ N/A ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ N/A ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ N/A ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ N/A ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
Nothing too important. Laws are cool

Status: Approved.

I have finished this review on: (9/29/2017)
I will edit my post in Star Army Military Police Approval Thread to reflect this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top