Star Army

Star ArmyⓇ is a landmark of forum roleplaying. Opened in 2002, Star Army is like an internet clubhouse for people who love roleplaying, art, and worldbuilding. Anyone 18 or older may join for free. New members are welcome! Use the "Register" button below.

Note: This is a play-by-post RPG site. If you're looking for the tabletop miniatures wargame "5150: Star Army" instead, see Two Hour Wargames.

  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 October and November 2024 are YE 46.8 in the RP.

Approved Submission [Galactic Horizon] Honeycomb Fabrication Module

SirSkully

Well-Known Member
Submission URL
https://stararmy.com/wiki/doku.php?id=corp:galactic_horizon:gh-u7-1a_honeycomb_fabricator
Submission Faction(s)
  1. Neshaten
Submission Terms
  1. I agree
So here is a miniature, aether-powered nanomachine fabricator that is a big part of something else I will submit soon - but seeing as it is such a pivotal part of that thing I just want to get this approved and smoothed out first ^ -^

Tagging @Kyle for Neshy approval

Also not tagging club because we both decided we talk about my submissions enough privately that this isn't needed anymore (he even put it in the OOC section of the Galactic Horizon page by the way, just so you know)

Also I'd like to ask if @FrostJaeger could take this submission? he's been dealing with mine lately in a rather speedy and efficient manner so I'd like that ^ -^
 
This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
Hello! Let's see if this submission meets the requirements for inclusion in Star Army's lore...

[ ✔️ ] 1. The destination URL should be a page in the appropriate namespace and titled lower_case_with_underscores.
[ ✔️ ] 2. The article is in the appropriate format and article template.
[ ✔️ ] 3. The article follows our wiki style guidelines, including: No forced line breaks, text after each section header, etc.
[ ✔️ ] 4. The article is easily read and free of errors in spelling and grammar.
[ ✔️ ] 5. Links to other wiki articles are present as appropriate.
[ ❌ ] 6. The article fits into the Star Army universe's space opera theme and technology levels.
[ N/A ] 7. Images in the article are hosted on Star Army's wiki and sourced responsibly (contact Wes privately if there's a concern).
[ ✔️ ] 8. The article is original and doesn't contain copy-pasted content from other articles.
[ N/A ] 9. The article complies with Star Army's rules in terms of damage ratings, speed limits, etc.
[ ✔️ ] 10. The Faction Manager(s), if applicable, have posted approval for this article in this thread.

Here are some fixes this article still needs:
  1. Would you mind making the Honeycomb heavier, less flexible, and more expensive, please? I ask because in my official opinion matter-to-energy conversion isn't something that should be cheap, readily available (due to its vast potential of applications and misapplications), or lightweight - and I'm fairly certain that aether generators are not bendable.
  2. How fast can the Honeycomb produce objects?
  3. Would you mind including a note of some kind that states certain materials - like Zesuaium - can't be produced, please?
When these fixes are made, please post a reply here so I can re-check the article. Thank you!

Status: Pending
 
Following a nearly two-hour-long discussion between @SirSkully and I on Discord, we've made edits to the article that fulfill the requests I made above, therefore...

Hello! Let's see if this submission meets the requirements for inclusion in Star Army's lore...

[ ✔️ ] 1. The destination URL should be a page in the appropriate namespace and titled lower_case_with_underscores.
[ ✔️ ] 2. The article is in the appropriate format and article template.
[ ✔️ ] 3. The article follows our wiki style guidelines, including: No forced line breaks, text after each section header, etc.
[ ✔️ ] 4. The article is easily read and free of errors in spelling and grammar.
[ ✔️ ] 5. Links to other wiki articles are present as appropriate.
[ ✔️ ] 6. The article fits into the Star Army universe's space opera theme and technology levels.
[ N/A ] 7. Images in the article are hosted on Star Army's wiki and sourced responsibly (contact Wes privately if there's a concern).
[ ✔️ ] 8. The article is original and doesn't contain copy-pasted content from other articles.
[ N/A ] 9. The article complies with Star Army's rules in terms of damage ratings, speed limits, etc.
[ ✔️ ] 10. The Faction Manager(s), if applicable, have posted approval for this article in this thread.

Status: Approved

Thanks again for submitting an article to the wiki! Time for some final steps for the reviewer...

[ ✔️ ] 1. State clearly that the article is approved in the submission thread
[ ✔️ ] 2. Move the wiki article to its permanent (destination) location on the wiki
[ ✔️ ] 3. Move the submission thread to the Approved Submissions subforum or get a moderator to
[ ✔️ ] 4. Edit the article to add a link to the approval thread in the OOC Notes section
[ ✔️ ] 5. Link other articles to the approved article as appropriate (equipment lists, etc.)
 
@SirSkully - To prevent the Honeycomb Fabricator from being overpowered and conflicting with the technology levels of the Star Army setting, would you mind making the following changes, please?
  • The production rate needs to be changed to 1 cubic centimeter/second.
  • There needs to be a mention that the multiple Honeycomb units working in close proximity to one another have decreased output due to their aether reactors "overdrawing" from the aether in that area.
I know that I approved their current values, and I apologize for not bringing this up sooner. >.<[/url]
 
@FrostJaeger I know you don't care much for my input, and that using other submissions to validate one is technically against the rules, but you're talking about how this compares to the setting, so you're using other submissions to invalidate it, so I'll speak.

There is another fabricator in the setting that is -much- more powerful than this one, and have been around since YE29, no one really uses it, but I haven't seen it be targeted for being over powered. When you looked at this you obviously didn't think of it as over powered, but now you're saying it is. I can only assume that's because either someone told you about something that was weaker, or you fond one, but Skully has a point, you didn't think it was OP while working the numbers before, so maybe it's not OP and whatever you're comparing to is just under powered.
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top