Star Army

Star ArmyⓇ is a landmark of forum roleplaying. Opened in 2002, Star Army is like an internet clubhouse for people who love roleplaying, art, and worldbuilding. Anyone 18 or older may join for free. New members are welcome! Use the "Register" button below.

Note: This is a play-by-post RPG site. If you're looking for the tabletop miniatures wargame "5150: Star Army" instead, see Two Hour Wargames.

  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 October and November 2024 are YE 46.8 in the RP.

Approved Submission Gingas Bomber Update

Arbitrated

The Smollest Smol
Submission Type: Small Craft Update
Submission URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:stararmy:small_craft:ke-v7_ginga_bomber
Old URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=stararmy:small_craft:ke-v7_ginga_bomber
Faction: Yamatai/Star Army
FM Approved Yet? No, @Wes must approve this
Faction requires art? It has art from the old version.

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles? Nope
Contains New art? Nada
Previously Submitted? Iiii.... Don't think so?

Notes: Honestly, the old page was barely a stub.
 
Last edited:
This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
I’m in class and can’t pull up my checklist right now...so this is all cursory stuff.
  • Typo in Weapon Systems: “A large munitions bay in the senter of the craft...”
  • That’s all so far.
 
Alright, now time for the proper review LOL

This review is for: Ginga Bomber Update

The submitted article is/has…
[ YES ] A very high level of overall quality
[ YES ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ YES ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ YES ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
  • The Ginga Bomber is Yamatai's only bomber and also a stub of an article. Very out of date.
[ YES ] In the proper format/template
  • The Ginga Bomber qualifies as a vehicle, therefore it falls under the vehicle template.
[ YES ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[ YES ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
  • Clarity could perhaps be increased with explicitly saying "The Ginga can hold 24 bombs"
[ YES ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ YES ] No red and/or broken links
[ YES ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ YES ] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[ NO ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
  • Unless you consider the original Ginga overpowered.
[ NO ] Obtusely redundant
[ NO ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ NO ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
  • FM Approved!
[ NO ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
  • The topic block is a direct copy-paste.
[ NO ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ NO ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ NO ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ NO ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ NO ] Lacking Detail
[ NO ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[ YES ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ YES ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ YES ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
  • Allowed to be the past, since this is an update.
[ YES ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.


Summary
No serious issues. Other than FM approval.

Status: Approved.

Notes
tadaaaa

I have finished this review on: 9/26/2017
 
Last edited:
Tbh you'd probably be better off using the starship template since this is large enough to have an interior deck.

Probably akin to the B-36 Peacemaker or B-52 Stratofortress.
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top