Wes said:
Can you go through it and fix all the sentence fragments? Wiki article prose should be in complete sentences.
Also, please do a search and remove the contraction "it's" entirely from the article (use "it is" or the possessive "its").
I have literally checked every single article listed for what you're looking for using Word and only found two instances of sentence fragments (one due to a typo).
Also, are we seriously getting picky over the usage of a contraction (which I could only find one instance in the entire article).
Pardon if this sounds aggressive, but I just spent almost an hour pouring over each article for something that seems trivial (in my opinion), since English uses contractions for a reason and this is not a professional article.
Wes said:
Running/Loping:60 kph (37.28 mph)
"Loping?"
Loping = Run or move with a long bounding stride: "the dog was loping along by his side".
Wes said:
The computer system article is very tiny and lacks detail.
It's tiny because it's a concise and accurate article that's only there to reduce copy pasta. I've read it a couple of times (not counting the multiple times I read it when I created it) and it isn't lacking any data. The CU-23 is essentially a slightly more futuristic version of computers today. Not much can be said other than that.
Wes said:
The command and control module doesn't say what it's actually for (should it link to the Jager?).
Done.
Wes said:
The Radio article has an empty section under the title header where the overview paragraph should be.
Done.
Wes said:
Negative Feedback should not be capitalized.
I capitalized it to emphasize, but I have edited it now.
Wes said:
If possible, list the DR of each weapon next to its link.
I normally don't do that because most of my weapon designs have multiple damage types due to modes and or ammunition. Also, I'm of the firm opinion that people can just click upon the links to find out. We're trying to reduce copy-pasta after all.
However, I have done as you ask.