It's understandable, when you spend time writing up a page you forget what things you did and didn't put and things get missed, I know how it is.
However onto the scope. There is really only 'one thing' wrong this this article, but it's gonna require some writing. Pretty much the problem comes down to, even though there is a nice story behind this, and a decent chunk of text in the Function and design section, this article doesn't highlight what makes this different in function from just any random variable scope. I'm not saying it's not different, I have confidence in that, but reading the article wont tell someone why they should buy this one instead of another one.
The other thing isn't a 'problem' but a question. It mentions having a proprietary version of the MOASS, but the scope is made by Zen and not GH? Just checking but was that a miswrite, or did they license a special version form GH?