1: I am a little wary of the Gamma Ray Emitter. If it does light damage to the armor, do you believe the Gamma Rays would still penetrate to harm the organic lifeform within? I would imagine most armors would have counter measures against cosmic rays and the like. Maybe not much, but it may indeed be there. But that is not the point of this. If you are implying it does, then would you kindly list the damage on the personal scale for references sake? As well as how long it would take perhaps. I'd rather leave this one up to someone else atm since I'm a bit busy.
Yes, I am implying that. I'll add it onto the weapon's page.Nashoba said:OI-M1-3108 Ionic Pulse Weapon
This is a weaker version of a starship weapon, but this weaker version has a range in space of 150,000 km (90,000 miles) but the cannon only goes 3000 miles
The rate of fire for the weaker is significantly higher, firing 9 times in the same amount of time the starship mounted version fires only 2 times. I presume you are implying that the weaker version has a faster recharge cycle.
Nashoba said:Space Missiles
Do we really need an anti-matter missile OI-Z3C Space Missiles?
Functionally the OI-Z3b is also a Frame Weapon, and has greater range and does the same damage except without anti-matter?
Seems redundant.
Nashoba said:The 0I-Z3b operates both in atmosphere and space.
accelerating it to .1c.
Range: 60 KM in atmosphere, 500,000 KM in Space
Muzzle Velocity: Mach 7.6 in atmosphere, .0001c in Space
This makes the OI-Z3C redundant.
Moogle said:Why not have the blade vibrate instead? I believe something about an incredibly high frequency of vibration makes things shatter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?