• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 May and June 2024 are YE 46.4 in the RP.

Approved Submission [Pact] Colonial Pact Systems Designation Index

This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
This review is for: Colonial Systems Designation Index
Don't use that link; it goes to the non-WIP form of the page.

The submitted article is/has…
[ Y ] A very high level of overall quality
[ Y] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ N/A ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)\\
[ Y ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
  • It has been a common complaint that Pact articles do not use standard nomenclature, yet Arieg has expressed displeasure towards standard nomenclature. This was his response to that problem for his faction.
[ Y ] In the proper format/template
[ Y ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[ Y ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[ Y ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ Y ] No red and/or broken links
[ N/A ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ Y ] Reasonably neutral point of view

The submitted article is/does not…
[ N ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ N ] Obtusely redundant
[ N ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ N ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ N ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ N ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ N ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ N ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ N ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
  • Technicality: Uses a WIP Article. Doesn't matter though, just an example.
[ N ] Lacking Detail
[ N/A ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)

The article has…
[ N/A ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ N/A ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ N/A ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ N/A ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
  • It is a nomenclature system.


Summary
One Issue: How do you differentiate between, say, two missile launchers made in a single year?

Status: Approved.

I have finished this review on: 9/18/2017
 
Last edited:
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top