5 Armor Scale SP does seem like a lot, which was why the pack was originally 4 to put it in line with similar submissions, and then was reduced to Personal scale 20, then personal scale 15. The pack was set to 5 Armor scale at your (and technically Wes's) request.
I would also like to know how you get to the 3SP number, as you're applying a 0.6 modifier to the base amount of the device. The implication here is that at Armor Scale SP 3, you could just apply the 0.6 again... the point being that armor modifier isn't really for DVr2, and it doesn't really make sense to apply it there as there is no method to making the base number to apply the modifier to. I could just as easily say the pack's original Armor scale structure point value is actually 8 which is why it is 5 now, which again doesn't make sense as we're really crossing wires between systems here.
I would also point out that two facing shields are 'more common' on starships and mecha, but there really is no guideline for where they can and can't be used. It doesn't make sense to adjust it here unless those rules are fixed so that there is a reason to change it here. Again, unlike the Mindy, this pack only has the sides and rear for mounting shield projectors, so it makes sense for it to have a left/right configuration where a half bubble is projected to either side from a single emitter panel on either side, but again the Dvr 3 system only allows for front/rear so it makes sense to use 2 facing.
---
So I guess what I want for clarity:
Do I listen to the Fred who says 5 Armor Scale SP is correct, and rejected the 3 Armor Scale (15 Personal Scale)?
Or do I listen to the Fred who says the 3 Armor Scale (15 PS) is the correct amount, and refuses to approve the 5 Armor Scale version?
---
Then there is the further question of do we go by what Fred is saying here regarding shield facings? Or do we go by what is on the rules page? If we go by what Fred is saying here would anyone mind if I go in and fix the DVR3 page to bring it in line with what I'm being told by the staff?
---
The SP value of the pack has also been changed to read 'Pack SP'