Approved Submission SKCS Itano

[Zack]

Submission Type: Starship
Submission URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:starship:skcs_itano
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:starship:skcs_itano:skcm

Faction: Uso
FM Approved Yet? Yes
Faction requires art? Yes

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles? Yes
Contains New art? Yes
Previously Submitted? Yes / thread locked

Notes:
Did as Ame requested,

Also I get why you might not want ships to have higher level shields than their armor value, but why prevent ships from having a lower shield value than their armor value? I was trying to go for 'this isn't a super high tech ship'. Then there is the question of why would you even have separate values for both in DRv3 if there is no reason to have them as two different values (As they will always be the same number)?

Quips about rules aside, this should be ready to go.

 

[Zack]

Updated

 

[Ametheliana]

This review is for: SKCS Itano with URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:starship:skcs_itano

The submitted article is/has…
[ :3] A very high level of overall quality
[ :3] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ :3] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[ :3] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[ :3] In the proper format/template
[ :3] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[ :3] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[ :3] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ :3] No red and/or broken links
[ :3] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ :3] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[ :3] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ :3] Obtusely redundant
[ :3] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ :3] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ :3] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ :3] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ :3] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ :3] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ :3] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ :3] Lacking Detail
[ :3] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[ :3] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ :3] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ :3] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ :3] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.

Approved