This review is for: SKCS Itano with URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:starship:skcs_itano
The submitted article is/has…
[ :3] A very high level of overall quality
[ :3] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ :3] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[ :3] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[ :3] In the proper format/template
[ :3] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[ :3] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[ :3] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ :3] No red and/or broken links
[ :3] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ :3] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[ :3] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ :3] Obtusely redundant
[ :3] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ :3] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ :3] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ :3] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ :3] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ :3] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ :3] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ :3] Lacking Detail
[ :3] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[ :3] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ :3] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ :3] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ :3] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.
Approved