I don't have anything against how you've linked things, but the article still needs to stand on its own. I don't expect everything to be laid out at the same level of detail. A casual mention and a reference is fine.
My comments around interacting with the Mimicat's computer functions are suggestions/preferences and a joke that I don't think landed as well as I'd hoped. It's your choice whether you want to address them or not. As a reader, I had questions for longer than I expected and it seemed worth sharing. I'll try to make my suggestions vs requests more clear.
Removing the DR sounds good. Generally, I think it's fine for something to have components that are more durable than the thing they reside in. Black boxes, etc. It makes a lot of sense that it's "brain" would be more durable than the rest of the Mimicat.
The HONEY generator's article doesn't mention water in any capacity other than "about the size of a water bottle." Also, the
Mimicom's article makes it clear that the recharge system isn't a standard feature:
"The BURST system also powers a self-refueling function, which uses electrolysis to extract hydrogen from humidity in the air, though it is more effective to make the Mimicom drink in order to electrolyze enough hydrogen to continue functioning. Roughly four liters of water must be drunk in order to completely fill the fuel supply. "
If you'd like to make a brief mention in that area along the lines of, "Like the Mimicom, the Mimicat can recharge itself," or something alone those lines with a link to the Mimicom's article, then I'd say you're good.
Largely minor details all in all. It's a solid article, just a few things that I think would round it out nicely. Sorry if I'm being too pedantic, but I really like it!