I've noticed that a lot of devices have more or less detailed descriptions of the many things they do well against, but very little if any information about what they do poorly against.
The descriptions of the various forms of cloaking and stealth technology, like the CFS stealth function, really should mention at least one or two detection methods from which that particular stealth method cannot hide, as well as any limitations it may impose - such as any actions which that method of stealth either prevents or cannot completely hide. For instance, can a ship fire weapons while using this or that type of cloak, and can it do so without giving away its position.
For those of you reading this and thinking "there is no way a ship can shoot without giving away its positions", that is not necessarily entirely true, especially for non-beam weapons. Missiles, torpedoes and similar munitions might well be possible to fire stealthily, though they might need to be specifically designed for such use; presumably "stealth model" torpedoes would have some other disadvantage (higher cost, reduced performance, etc.) with respect to the standard models.
I could make similar remarks about some of the shield and weapon descriptions - there are plenty of weapons that say neither this shield, nor that shield, nor some other shield can block them, but fail to mention what type of shield does. In fact, only scalar weapons say what kind of shielding (any kind that completely blocks both electromagnetism and gravity, in this case) IS effective against them.