CadetNewb
Well-Known Member
A 'Gravimetric Drive' is essentially a fancy way of saying Graviton Drives, right? I was told so on the IRC, but the article doesn't seem to be consistent with that. A drive that works by manipulating gravity to either repel or pull an object along wouldn't be inertia-less, would it? I thought that ships and so forth using it would still have mass, and resist any attempts to change its state of motion. That they're subject to being nullified by Anti-FTL fields (which no longer work in setting anyways) also strikes me as odd.
Am I mixing up two different things, or is it just written weird?
Am I mixing up two different things, or is it just written weird?