Legix
Inactive Member
Kinda why I'd rather flesh them out, since many "stubs" have seen usage in the past. It's better to expand on what we have, which has seen use, than make more that MIGHT be used.One of many examples of something in the NMX which is a stub rather than something truly fleshed out:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:mishhuvurthyar:nmx_cruiser
The NMX faction is filled with stub articles like this. Which is why I'd personally welcome the effort. Not to mention that the Star Army of Yamatai isn't exactly static, so, I don't see why the NMX would be.
I mean...
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:mishhuvurthyar:organization
Wow, such detail.
I want to iterate what I mean by this, since after I posted I figured it might be misunderstood.
New content is fine if it fills gaps. But the NMX have so many ship designs and the like which could simply get their articles expanded on and it'd be more viable and easier to use them as tools. When you're "repairing" a faction to the current standard versus the old, it's better to start with what you have before wildly throwing things in and just leaving our site further damaged by not updating these older articles.
It's the reason Nepleslia didn't just start throwing out 50 types of new submissions when DRv3 came out. It updated the ships it intends to use/still uses in RP. I can't imagine the NMX replacing their entire fleet, regardless of each little potential sect. If there's to be an NMX/SMX revamp or "upgrade", then we need to make a baseline by improving the many things that DON'T need to be replaced and need to be expanded on.
Last edited: