What's new
  • If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 May and June 2024 are YE 46.4 in the RP.

Approved Submission Albion class battlecarrier

This suggestion has been implemented. Votes are no longer accepted.
Can you fill this out more? Put where things are (port, starboard, aft, etc) in interior as well as a bit more to help players understand what's going on inside and how to navigate the ship.

Flesh out propulsion a bit more.

Follow the DR templates.
 
might need help with the DR template part, barely figured that out for my armor submission, and that was with zack telling me what went in that section
 
@Ametheliana added some positional information for different sections, and added a little to the propulsion page section. not sure if it was enough, and there is still the DR rating bit, I still need help on that. Sorry if my edits aren't enough, this was alex's thing, not quite familiar with what he had in mind. So please bear with me, I giving it my best guess.
 
This review is for: Albion with URL: https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:project_norse

The submitted article is/has…
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] A very high level of overall quality
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] A general topic sentence under the title header
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Artwork (Required for new species; Strongly recommended for vehicles and hand weapons)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Needed and/or useful to the setting
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] In the proper format/template
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Proofread for spelling and grammar
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Easy to read and understand (not a lengthy mass of technobabble)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Wikified (terms that could be a link should be a link)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] No red and/or broken links
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Reasonably scientifically plausible
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Reasonably neutral point of view
The submitted article is/does not…
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Overpowered (or cutting tech for a faction with little or no roleplay)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Obtusely redundant
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Contain copy pasta descriptions of systems or interior compartments
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Unauthorized by faction managers or player-controlled corporation
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Contain references to IC events that have not occurred (SM must authorize retcons)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Use second-person language (“you” or “your”) unless it is an instructional guide aimed at players.
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Use bombastic language (“virtually immune,” “nearly indestructible,” “insanely powerful,” “horrible effects”)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Use an unbalanced header/text ratio (many headers but sections are one-liners)
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Use major unapproved sub-articles that should be submitted separately
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Lacking Detail
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Images hosted on sites other than stararmy.com (Photobucket, Imageshack, etc are not allowed)
The article has…
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Speeds in compliance with the Starship Speed Standard, if applicable
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] Damage Capacity and Damage Ratings in compliance with the DR Guidelines
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] The in-character year of creation/manufacture. (Should be current year. Future years not allowed).
[ ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ] The Standard Product Nomenclature System, if applicable.

Approved
 
Any idea what the international standard product nomenclature for this battleship is? It is the first DOPE-made battleship?
 
This is a bit difficult, as it's a battlecarrier so could be either S6-B1-1a or S6-C1-1a. A more modern one would probably be CSW since it's the nationalized shipbuilding group, in which case it would probably be CSW-C1-1a or B1-1a
 
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top