given the times listed here
So even if these things count against USO's buildup limit, it's essentially up to @Wes at this point to say yes (which kind of happened when he approved the submission) or revise his take on the article.Military Buildup Limitations said:The buildup limitations are intended for nation states, not for their subordinate organizations such as corporations. Corporate and civilian ships not involved in national defense are not limited ... Note: The above section is a general guideline, and does not need to be tracked or adhered to in an “exact” fashion. It should only be invoked in the face of an unjustified factional mass-expansion, particularly one that is not done through plot-based roleplaying.
By owning the biggest class of spacebound shipyards available on the market and filling it with people who's focus is to build ships... stealing Kuvexian manufacturing technology helps automate many processes too.How can the Frontier Service Corporation have the following assets...
...when the manufacturer of those assets, USO, has (according to the numbers listed here, here, and here) a deficit - as in, it somehow has more starships then it could have possibly built given the times listed here - of 13 Broadsword-class Light Cruisers and 218 C5b Drones?
- 8 Broadsword-class Light Cruisers
- 1,015 C5 Drones
- 315 C5b Drones
- 235 C5c Drones
- 110 C5d Drones
By owning the biggest class of spacebound shipyards available on the market and filling it with people who's focus is to build ships...
... stealing Kuvexian manufacturing technology helps automate many processes too.
...with a named NPC captain...
...which is far more detail than most people provide. That should count for something.
And finally, are you really trying to smother the 188604 plot again or have you simply never stopped? I mean, your rivalry with Zack is one thing, are you honestly trying to get me to put you on ignore as well?
[...]
I think the real question is how this affects Frost enough to warrant his attention. This was approved by Wes, I'm sure if it were a real problem the creator of the setting would have caught it.
The Player Rights said:8. I have the right to comment on any setting article being submitted for approval, since changes to the setting may affect my characters or plots. [...]
It isn't slander if it's true.
You've been harassing us from day one...
...and the whole community has seen it.
Quote your rights Frost, I will ignore them as you ignore mine.
I have backed up this entire company with IC events.
I would be overjoyed to see you do the same.
By the way, they're not military ships you beautiful genius...
...they're glorified satellites.
The buildup limitations are intended for nation states, not for their subordinate organizations such as corporations.
It’s right at the start of the article quoted. Why are we even responding to frost if he isn’t bothering to read the rules?
Do I have to just keep coming in here and quoting the very obvious bolded/highlighted line that he somehow skipped over every time he posts in the NTSE?
You know, he keeps on quoting his right to post in any thread he feels like despite knowing that none of us want to talk to him because of his endless nitpicking.
It is called harassment, and it is a crime. Maybe we should hire a lawyer and sue for emotional distress?
Rizz, don’t feed the trolls. Just put him on ignore.
Frost, did you just argue that the military buildup guidelines do apply to the FSC in one paragraph and then argue that they don’t in the next?
I think he did. Man, that's a bad argument! I don't know what to believe!
Look at me not taking my own advice.
Seriously just put him on ignore and move on. If you starve him of attention he’ll leave.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?