How can the
Frontier Service Corporation have the following assets...
...when the manufacturer of those assets,
USO, has (according to the numbers listed
here,
here, and
here) a
deficit - as in, it somehow has more starships then it could have possibly built given the times listed
here - of 13
Broadsword-class Light Cruisers and 218
C5b Drones?
This is pertinent to the topic.
So even if these things count against USO's buildup limit, it's essentially up to
@Wes at this point to say yes (which kind of happened when he approved the submission) or revise his take on the article.
This is also pertinent.
By owning the biggest class of spacebound shipyards available on the market and filling it with people who's focus is to build ships... stealing Kuvexian manufacturing technology helps automate many processes too.
Plus, FSCorp is not the USO.
Additionally every ship is named, with a named NPC captain, which is far more detail than most people provide. That should count for something.
This was one of the responses (without the vitriol)
Those shipyards, are they currently building ships based on military buildup times?
Ame asked this.
Theoretically they could probably go faster. It's a massive station filled with SARP-tech, the same station OI uses to generate thousands of ships, idk. There aren't any numbers I can use for reference to the station besides that chart, but I didn't use it. It's simply a massive station built for mass production.
This was another (again without the vitriol)
The buildup limitations are intended for nation states, not for their subordinate organizations such as corporations.
Zack had this to chip in.
And most of the rest was loads of disrespectful garbage, which was aired, and reciprocated. As I can see
within the context of this thread, FrostJaeger did not start being antagonistic, pointed out a point of reasonable concern, and only got snappy against much more antagonistic responses.
Wes was already tagged by Raz. If Wes wants to reconsider matters regarding those ship numbers, he'll be able to swing back and comment on them. In the meantime, I'm locking this thread. If you don't hear from Wes again, assume it's because he's fine with this state of affair.
Frankly, I'm not too fond of this resolution so far because it default in having people I've found acting super disrespectful win their point. No matter how justified the concerned parties might be, you stoop to a level that makes
you wrong.
But my role here isn't to be fair, it's to keep the peace and stop this trainwreck. So, stop it I will.