Uso Tasuki said:In the sense of what characters do with it, no it does not have to be justified. If people won't use it in RP then it won't be used, simple as that.
Uso Tasuki said:Ontop of this the people saying that it won't be used are people who aren't playing in Nepleslia and who don't have a say in what they would use.
Kilian said:Oh? I didn't know that the damper field already had an approved version here. Don't mind my post then. It was simply the fact that I have met the 'damper field' in different sci-fi areas in the same meaning I explained above. I guess the source of this whole damper field issue is not here then. Sorries Uso.
Kotori said:Okay okay, time to put an end to this. You guys are going in circle.
I myself can't seem to see why that Penrose disruptor couldn't make the cut as a type of disabling weapon as it is presented in terms of effect. I haven't seen anyone (or noticed, sorry) give a visual description of what it looks like when in use, so, I'll just assume if fires is continuous electric blue beam. If my mental image is wrong, by all means, correct me.
Now, this could possibly be replaced by the scalar cannon, but scalar cannons have hazards of their own, which include frying nerves and making ammo cook off (though arguably this could be a functionality, not a side-effect). The dangers would be there and whatever IC implications would still be valid.
Regardless... with the turn this discussion has taken, it seems the prevalent concern isn't quite what the feasibility of the weapon, but rather if it would be used in play for Nepleslia's police force. I myself believe that even though Uso is stressing that IC stuff would be roleplayed out... it's actually produced by Geshrinari Shipyards, which - up to my knowledge - no one really has control on.
I believe by this point it should be either for Tom or Wes to decide if the said ship variant and it's weaponry will make the cut, given what they feel Geshrinari Shipyards can produce and what the Nepleslian police would be allowed to use ICly.
Kotori said:Additionally, I haven't seen the Penrose disrupter approved anywhere. Perhaps this ghoul variant could be equipped with already approved technology and then, when you can come up with the sort of weaponry you'd want (as presented in the contribution boards), you could make another variant.
Uso Tasuki said:My point is you really aren't in a position to say what the nepleslian goverment would or would not do.
Uso Tasuki said:Nepleslian military and police policy would be determined by either Emperor Blackman or Admiral Davis, both of which are played by Tom, not you.
So if there are still no objections to the tech aspects of the ship...
Scribbles said:I was hoping to avoid having to get into the physics at the current time, because it seems people often just kind of stare at me blankly and say "I really don't understand, so lets go with SoD" when I do, to which I then have the reaction of -_-# . If everyone isn't going to be sated until they get this, I will post it then. You'll have to excuse me for at least a short while though, as translating this will take a little while.
Uso Tasuki said:Active Denial Field: The ship contains an ADF system on the hull that uses microwaves to stimulate pain receptors in the body, forcing targets to turn away and flee. Very effective against un armored targets but not intended for combat use.
Primary Purpose: anti-personnel
Secondary Purpose: sensor disruption/
Damage: Less than lethal.
Range: <1 mile
Rate of Fire: continuous.
Payload: Effectively unlimited, so long as the ship provides power.
Uso Tasuki said:Then... post... it...
You can't just say I have an argument, not post it, and expect it to have an effect.
Scribbles said:You'll have to excuse me for at least a short while though, as translating this will take a little while.
Uso Tasuki said:The Penrose interpretation of the universe holds that gravity is what holds things into one state of reality. Particles on the quantum level are far to small to be anchored to one reality so they experience the effects of quantum foam. This is far more believable than the current Copenhagen interpretation which holds that something doesn't exist until it is observed and as Einstein said, "I'd like to think the moon is there even when I'm not looking at it.â€
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?