Though not necessary, these things will help a lot in the long run.
1) For player convenience, I suggest that the page list the equipment that the IATF prefers to be used or special issues, and include a link to the rest of the NPF's standard inventory. That way, it's that much less navigating on their part should they be browsing the page.
2) What evidence/intel your PCs will have to look for to charge a crooked cop will need to be known clearly and in advance by the GM, but doesn't need to be listed here - it can be told IC during a briefing for an example. Still, make sure to put it down somewhere instead of keeping it in memory.
3) Ranks should be linked on this page from their normal page to simplify navigation and also help the article's appearance. Right now, that part looks very bare. Additionally, any details about where the players fit in and who their boss is isn't necessary for this page since this is the organization page. That info should be on the plot page instead, which is another topic entirely.
4) You'll have to figure out how they police themselves. Either by having the IPG come in and take a look once in a while, or by having some 'founders' or somesuch handpick members they believe are not bad - even then, the occasional rot is great for plot and such. Imperfection allows us to have a great story in the first place after all. Without it, we just have some mary-sue stuff that gets boring fast.
5) Nobody outside of the IATF should know they're in the IATF - it's how the FBI does undercover things to the point their agents are living double lives after all. And they do it that way for a good reason. It's the best way to do it.
6) As for where they're based, a few broad strokes should be good enough. Saying each major planet with a major police presence has an IATF HQ somewhere while fleeting, small colonies likely only have a handful of agents is likely work.
Ultimately, it will be
@Koenig808 that will approve or disapprove it however. I and Sigma can only give our recommendations I believe. To be honest, and I don't mean to be rude, but I do feel the article is very bare bones and could be better. But even then, I feel it's enough to get your feet wet. He however, disagrees, and for good reasons.