Sigma
Inactive Member
Okay. I'm now awake, have had sleep and no longer the zombie I was when I first read this last night.
If you want one part of the site to be wear gloves, then it makes no sense for the rest of the site to be exempt. SARP is not a child-friendly website as it is. Removing smoking will do nothing in that regard. You would also have to address the obvious gender stereotypes present within the setting, the NMX/SMX use of slave soldiers, and various other things that make the setting less than ideal. I deal with parents daily and even the most liberal of them would be hesitant about this site, even without smoking. Why? The site's main focus is on violence and pretending to shoot at each other.
Since we are now casting aspersions on Nepleslia, please point to me the occasions in 4th Fleet or NSS Venus that you believe promote smoking. Point out every occasion you find fault with, every promotion of smoking within our plots. You say that the plots promote smoking, I want evidence. Where in 4th Fleet? In Venus? Where is this promotion?
You have singled out Nepleslia and its leadership, questioned our honor, now back it up. As much as I respect that this is your playground, Wes, you have stepped over the line by making a rule that specifically targets and discriminates ONE FACTION and its players. This is now a matter of principle. Either the spirit of the law (less visceral, degrading stuff happens) is applied universally or you drop it. Those are the only fair options. Your proposal is highly discriminatory. Your arguments are rather tenuous to start with, your evidence is, hitherto, non-existent save for hypothetical situations. There are very few endings to this, Wes, especially if you want to force your will upon an entire faction of players without their consent.
I wish to say that, as a teacher, I find this argument a bit... flat. Children are not as oblivious as you think they are. Furthermore, if we have "children" on the site, it means we have players under the age of 13. Above 13 are teenagers. We all know the rule states that you need to be 16 and that its an honor system. I teach that age level and I don't see any evidence of there being children's writing on the site. If you know we have underaged members, I want to know why they haven't been booted. Otherwise, please don't use hyotheticals. If we're going to be child-friendly, then the 16+ rule should be tossed out, the guidelines on what constitutes child-friendly role-play should be drafted and the 18+ section removed.Plus, we have children on the site whose minds are still being developed and teenagers are particularly at-risk.
If you want one part of the site to be wear gloves, then it makes no sense for the rest of the site to be exempt. SARP is not a child-friendly website as it is. Removing smoking will do nothing in that regard. You would also have to address the obvious gender stereotypes present within the setting, the NMX/SMX use of slave soldiers, and various other things that make the setting less than ideal. I deal with parents daily and even the most liberal of them would be hesitant about this site, even without smoking. Why? The site's main focus is on violence and pretending to shoot at each other.
We already do. This, however, smacks of interference on your part. It comes across as you don't think we do enough so you want it to be more. In 4th Fleet, only Bastilen and Aleksei smoke regularly. 2/14 playable characters in the plot who smoke. And excluding the Grand Admiral who dislikes smoking.But RP is up to players to self regulate so my OP post was a call for that.
Since we are now casting aspersions on Nepleslia, please point to me the occasions in 4th Fleet or NSS Venus that you believe promote smoking. Point out every occasion you find fault with, every promotion of smoking within our plots. You say that the plots promote smoking, I want evidence. Where in 4th Fleet? In Venus? Where is this promotion?
You have singled out Nepleslia and its leadership, questioned our honor, now back it up. As much as I respect that this is your playground, Wes, you have stepped over the line by making a rule that specifically targets and discriminates ONE FACTION and its players. This is now a matter of principle. Either the spirit of the law (less visceral, degrading stuff happens) is applied universally or you drop it. Those are the only fair options. Your proposal is highly discriminatory. Your arguments are rather tenuous to start with, your evidence is, hitherto, non-existent save for hypothetical situations. There are very few endings to this, Wes, especially if you want to force your will upon an entire faction of players without their consent.