• If you were supposed to get an email from the forum but didn't (e.g. to verify your account for registration), email Wes at [email protected] or talk to me on Discord for help. Sometimes the server hits our limit of emails we can send per hour.
  • Get in our Discord chat! Discord.gg/stararmy
  • 📅 February and March 2024 are YE 46.2 in the RP.

Rejected Submission RUDaaS Missile

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zack

Inactive Member
Submission Type: Missile / container
Template Used: N/A
Submission WIP URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_container
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_missile
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_m4000_fuze
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_ree_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudass_multimissile_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:corp:fscorp:rudaas_emp_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_ftl_module
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=wip:faction:uso:rudaas_yuuko_howitzer_warhead

Submission Destination URL:
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_container
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_missile
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_m4000_fuze
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_ree_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudass_multimissile_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=corp:fscorp:rudaas_emp_warhead
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_ftl_module
https://wiki.stararmy.com/doku.php?id=faction:uso:rudaas_yuuko_howitzer_warhead

Faction: USO
FM Approved Yet? Yes
Faction requires art? Yes

For Reviewers:
Contains Unapproved Sub-Articles? Yes
Contains New art? Yes
Previously Submitted? Yes People freaked out about having a shaped charge in space last time. The warhead has been adjusted to be a little bit more clear as to what it is, and to use less of an AOE.

Notes:
 
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
I fail to see how this could not follow the three light second rule, when that rule is an attack launched from outside of that range is going to miss.

It also has in the rules that missiles make their own ‘attack roll’ on their final pass.

If you want you can even count this as a small drone instead of a missile since it already is within the guidelines for that.

I’m within the submission rules from multiple angles here. If you guys have a problem with the rules then you should be bringing it up in another thread.
 
See this post as to why you're not following the "three light second rule," Zack - and there is nothing in the Starship Combat Guide regarding missiles making "their own 'attack roll' on their final pass."

Missiles are not counted as drones - nor is there any "guideline" that refers to them as such in the Weapon Limitations - and you are wrong, @Zack. You are not "within the submission rules from multiple angles" - you, as demonstrated below, are breaking "the submission rules from multiple angles."
 
Last edited:
I'm looking at wiki articles for the C9 Pine class. I think it's time we rereview this with the pine class in mind as its carrier. Something like this should have been submitted with the vertical cell launcher in mind. Now I wouldn't mind the vertical cell launcher being considered one weapon, but adding free weapons to any ship is bypassing the weapon limitations and while I think it is a dumbass rule it is a rule none the less. There are too many things working against this submission, and while I would hate to reject it that is currently the only option that we seem to have are you sure that we cannot work this out, Zack? I really want this submission to be approved, but it cannot exist in this state
 
These articles can be re-submitted at another time in separate submission threads so that they can be judged fairly as stand-alone pieces.

Rejected
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
RPG-D RPGfix
Back
Top